12-14-2006, 07:17 PM
|
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,517
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PHP-CODER-FOR-HIRE
I thought it was equally illegal to portray an adult as a minor in porn?
|
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/ht...-000-.html#8_C
Quote:
(8) ?child pornography? means any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where?
(A) the production of such visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
(B) such visual depiction is a digital image, computer image, or computer-generated image that is, or is indistinguishable from, that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or
(C) such visual depiction has been created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct.
.....
.....
.....
.....
(11) the term ?indistinguishable? used with respect to a depiction, means virtually indistinguishable, in that the depiction is such that an ordinary person viewing the depiction would conclude that the depiction is of an actual minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct. This definition does not apply to depictions that are drawings, cartoons, sculptures, or paintings depicting minors or adults.
|
|
|
|