Quote:
Originally Posted by RawAlex
Dig, actually, I slept 8.5 hours last night (set the alarm clock accordingly) and did a bunch of graphic work while this has been going on. Thanks for your concern.
Actually, I haven't directly spoken to anyone at Directnic or Mike himself in probably 2 years now, except maybe for an in passing post on a board here (I think I kidded him recently about domain kiting, something Directnic apparently did well enough to get attention on the subject from the mainstream).
No, my only agenda here is to sit and laugh at people who would spend all their time and effort to protect a CJ site that has some fairly questionable looking (but legal) thumbs on it but that trades traffic and links to some pretty glaringly bad sites, including CP, toolbar, virus, and spyware installers.
When I take out the tote board and figure it all out, Directnic comes out looking like champs.
Darksoul, so if I am missing it, where is the problem? Are you saying that Directnic is obliged to do business with someone regardless of the material on their sites? Is Directnic obliged to maintain a contract under any circumstance?
Please, enlighten me, preferably with actual paragraphs and stuff, okay?
|
Nobody is 'protecting a CJ site'. We're protecting OUR sites, because if they do it to this guy they'll do it to anyone. Especially considering that Mike has parked.com and many other competitive ventures with the people using his registrar service. It's only natural to suspect a less than angelic motive behind this action.
Also, NOBODY, and I mean NOBODY, is going to spend this much time defending the actions of a company they have no connection with. If I went to every single thread that has erupted concerning this situation and made a post, you would answer every single post. This isn't a casual thing for you, it's like life and death. Or a paycheck. You're not doing it because you have some deep seated affinity for the untrammeled power of registrars.