Quote:
Originally Posted by Slick
Going back to the comments of girls looking young in their pictures, with the philosophy that even if a girl is 18 years old, but looks young, it shouldn't be posted, does that mean that if a 15 year old has big tits and looks over 18, it's ok to post pictures of her ?????
|
no.
it means that you are intentionally showing girls which often look much younger than 18 and in doing so, are intentionally walking a very fine line between "legal" and "multiple felonies" and public enemy number 1... and not only that, the content is something that most people anywhere find questionable at best, regardless of the law. looking further, you link to people with even more questionable pics than your own, which doesn't help you.
i personally don't have a problem with it. but pretending that the powers that be does not is just stupid. like it or not YOU and YOU PICS are the target of the federal government right now. meaningless arguments, poor analogies and silly semantics, won't stop federal agents from arresting you and forcing you to defend yourself in a criminal trial.
you are already breaking the law being that you are not 2257 compliant anyway.
and how fucking dumb is this??? not only not legal, but you state yourself that you dont have any info at all for some content -
http://majorpervert.com/2257.html
i dont agree with what DirectNIC did if they have no legal liability for your content/domain. However, you just can't make any sensible arguments that you are operating fully within the law or that there isn't any reason for anyones concern either.