GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post - DirectNic

nation-x · 12-14-2006, 10:55 AM

Since there hasn't actually been a ruling as far as secondary producers go then really any discussion about criminal prosecution is moot. And I know for a fact that being a member or not being a member of FSC makes no difference because in the US we all share equal protection under the law. They can't choose to convict a non-member when they have chosen not to prosecute a member (based on membership) no matter what.

I have confidence that COPA will be amended to exclude the secondary producer from 2257 responsibility because it places un unreasonable burden on the secondary producer and violates the models right to privacy.

I think that COPA will say that no matter how old the model is... that if you present the model as preteen or underage that you will be responsible... much like the dope dealer that sells soap or coffee creamer can still be charged with selling dope because there is intent to commit a crime. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mens_rea

I like Slick and respect him as a webmaster... but I do have to agree that some of the thumbs on his sites are just not acceptable as good taste in my opinion.

Here are some examples I picked out.
http://206.161.206.211/majorpervert/th93229.jpg
http://206.161.206.211/majorpervert/th283876.jpg
http://206.161.206.211/majorpervert/th226671.jpg

I'm not trying to demonize you Slick. But honestly I think that their is a reason why these thumbs are at the top of the pile... It's because you get alot of traffic from sick perverts looking for underage girls. Your not the only one... http://bbs.adultwebmasterinfo.com/sh...ad.php?t=84846 <-- this is a thread about it from almost 2 years ago.

My recommendation is that you recrop those thumbs. (I know they are probably autocasted via TManager). I know you probably didn't hand crop any of those thumbs but you have to agree that they look like 13-14 yr olds.

12-14-2006, 10:55 AM
nation-x Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Rock Hill, SC Posts: 5,370	Since there hasn't actually been a ruling as far as secondary producers go then really any discussion about criminal prosecution is moot. And I know for a fact that being a member or not being a member of FSC makes no difference because in the US we all share equal protection under the law. They can't choose to convict a non-member when they have chosen not to prosecute a member (based on membership) no matter what. I have confidence that COPA will be amended to exclude the secondary producer from 2257 responsibility because it places un unreasonable burden on the secondary producer and violates the models right to privacy. I think that COPA will say that no matter how old the model is... that if you present the model as preteen or underage that you will be responsible... much like the dope dealer that sells soap or coffee creamer can still be charged with selling dope because there is intent to commit a crime. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mens_rea I like Slick and respect him as a webmaster... but I do have to agree that some of the thumbs on his sites are just not acceptable as good taste in my opinion. Here are some examples I picked out. http://206.161.206.211/majorpervert/th93229.jpg http://206.161.206.211/majorpervert/th283876.jpg http://206.161.206.211/majorpervert/th226671.jpg I'm not trying to demonize you Slick. But honestly I think that their is a reason why these thumbs are at the top of the pile... It's because you get alot of traffic from sick perverts looking for underage girls. Your not the only one... http://bbs.adultwebmasterinfo.com/sh...ad.php?t=84846 <-- this is a thread about it from almost 2 years ago. My recommendation is that you recrop those thumbs. (I know they are probably autocasted via TManager). I know you probably didn't hand crop any of those thumbs but you have to agree that they look like 13-14 yr olds.