I begin to wonder if you are blonde??
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carrie
1. They did not ask to see the 2257 documentation that only the DOJ or FBI has permission to ask for. Therefore no federal law has been violated.
|
They did NOT ask directly for the 2257 documentation, but asking for:
We require a current state issued photo id or passport for the models represented on the followings site that clearly shows their face and their date of birth.
- so you realy still think a registar can FORCE someone to provide WHATEVER information they want from 3rd persons and this is legal? Amazing. Why don't you see it isn't their work, just read this again which just tells me more than a TOS and i really hope the
RED helps you a bit in readint the important things. By the way
Quote:
First Amendment attorney and Free Speech Coalition Chairman Jeffrey Douglas said the ID request is unprecedented, and more importantly, a violation of privacy laws. According to Douglas, the request is illegal, and also could have a chilling effect on the free speech of webmasters that deal in legal teen content.
?This is a blatant and absolute violation of privacy laws,? Douglas told XBIZ. ?There?s absolutely no legal liability for the registrar if underage models appear on a website. DirectNIC is an officious intermeddler.?
Upon receiving a complaint of child pornography, there are legal courses of action for directNIC to take, Douglas said. Since it has no legal right to obtain personally identifiable information from the website?s models, the company should have alerted the proper legal authorities, but instead it decided to take the law into its own hands.
The FBI, the Association of Sites Advocating Child Protection (ASACP) and the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children operate hotlines for the reporting of child pornography.
|
and if you continue to read it
http://www.xbiz.com/news_piece.php?id=18587, which is an updated version from yesterday you will see that even DirectNIC didn't say a single word about the Request of ID's and do you know why? Because in differnce to you they mostly realized they CAN NOT do so that easy and as they want!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carrie
2. They have full jurisdiction to ask for proof of a model's age without violating her privacy, since Slick agreed to this when he entered into a contract with them.
|
Don't you see that neither slick, neither me or you can decide about the privacy about 100's other people? Whatever he agreed, it CAN NOT affect 3rd persons privacy. I bet with you US$ 500 that NEVER EVER you will see an statement or post from someone at DirectNic that they have the LEGAL RIGHT to request whatever personal information about 3rd pesons, do you take the bet?? If yes, call your buddies there and tell them to make a post here and i will send you in lightspeed the US$ 500.
Furthermore i ones more question that the even have the LEGAL RIGHT to delete, suspend or shut down a domain as such LEGAL RIGHT was ot given to them by ICAN
DirectNic requesting now "only" the ID's for the first 14 thumbs already shows me that they put in the "rear gear" because the realized they are acting not like they can and should.