Quote:
assumed you were talking about suing sponsors. my bad ;)
still... he can't sue directnic because he agreed to everything they are doing the moment he registered or transfered the domains with DirectNIC. its in their TOS. that is where their "right" to act like this comes from... its clearly stated in the terms of the contract that they both entered in to.
|
look, that's where you are just plain wrong. First of all such agreement can NOT involve 3rd persons like the models. Even if there is a TOS, there is also federal and other laws about privacy. You can't just that easy request the ID's from other people and there are good reasons why it's handled that way. You can NOT force anybody to do illegal things just to be confirm with your TOS. I can write in my TOS whatever i want, in a contract too, but if it's not law confirm it's just not valid. And there is no TOS that gives you the right to involve 3rd persons or data about them. These are things the authorities handle, not registars or self-claimed-content-censors.
Also, nobody answered to this so far, mostly because i'am right about it. DirectNIC is NOT the owner of the domain, ICANN is!!! Icann has Not given any rights to Directnic to terminate, delete, suspend or shut down sites. Therefor after NOT having such rights given by the owner, they just can't do so. You can only do with properties that are not your own the things you have the rights to do. Feel free to read the ICANN agreement with the Registars
http://www.icann.org/registrars/ra-a...nt-17may01.htm and if i miss something let me know please, but i doubt as it's clearly stated that if domain disputes appear it needs arbitration decissions. (sorry for my bad english, isn't my native language, hope you can understand what i want to say).
So just to fit it together, the DirectNic TOS is just something fitted together their own, without rights, without legal base and how they handle things is just NOT law confirm, even illegal.