Quote:
Originally Posted by sarettah
First off, I am not a directnic employee, my only connection is that I have domains there and I happen to have a 5 year or so board relationship with MikeAI.
I am also not a lawyer and I can tell by what you write that you are not a lawyer either.
hat said, para c indicates that I (as a peron with a domain registered at directnic) will allow directnic to take all necessary steps to investigate whether I have violated these rules. One necessary step would be determining if indeed it is underage/illegal content. Therefore requesting that I provide age docs might be a valid request within the scope of their investigation.
The question of whether slik can give those documents is where privacy comes into play. Directnic can request anything they want from someone, as can you or I. If someone provides the information to them (or you or I) the person providing the info may be in violation of the law but the one making a request has not, imho, violated any laws at that point.
.
|
sorry for the missunderstanding in first place, i thought you might be affilated or an employee there.
But you are for sure TOTALLY wrong in your statement that only the person giving out information is violating laws. In this case he gets FORCED to do so, which is clearly stated in the email (either give us .. or we shut down ...)
Even without being a lawyer (but being someone dealt x times with laws) i can tell you that this could be a crime, at very least it's illegal. Just ot make it more clear, someone asking to do someone an illegal action is generally sentenced like the one doing the illegal action. In this case it's even harder, because he gets FORCED to do so and maybe only his post in this forum and thread avoided him to do so!