|
BoyAlley, you miss my point entirely. I know this isn't DCMA, but I have a feeling that there may be legal liabilities for Directnic if someone says "I know that this image is CP", and they fail to take action. I suspect that thier TOS (as quoted above) is written specifically to give them very agressive means by which they may take action to remedy a situation or remove themselves from a position of liability.
No, they are not in the positon to check 2257 documents, they are not the AG... but if someone reports a CP image to Directnic and they do nothing... where would they be legally? I suspect that the hosting company may be looking at a similar piece of paper if it was sent that way.
The question I have are:
Where did the complaint come from, if any, or is this just a random check by Directnic itself?
Is the source of the complaint credible, or is it an anonymous tip?
Is Directnic's TOS in these matters in line with the overall rights of a registrar as granted by ICANN or whoever it is that grants those things these days?
=-=-=-=-=-=
As a side note, I looked at some of Slick's TGPs, and I could see where some members of the public might be lead to think that some of the models might not be of age. Baiting pedos with legal images is a trick that has been around for a very long time indeed.
|