|
Here maybe is a good way to look at it:
if you are going from an in house program that doesn't support stuff like multiple processors, backups, etc... and you are looking to go that way, well... NATS is a good answer.
If you are trying to be better than average, well, NATS is a decent answer.
if you are moving from, say, ccbill tracking to your own affiliate program, it is certainly a good answer, and will lend credibility to your deal.
Now, the downsides I see:
- Many programs are using it, which means you won't be any better than any number of programs out there.
- Some of the ways that galleries are such are presented to affiliates can be a bit of a pain at times.
- When something bad happens to NATS (say like this week's "not a shave" module deal) you can get caught up in the issue in passing.
On balance, if NATS is much better than where you sit right now, well, do it.
|