Quote:
Originally posted by gothweb
I can see your point... I do think that if someone has a gun to oppose a tyrranical government, they probably have the right to it (according to the 2nd amendment). However, most people do not have guns for that primary reason-- at most, they add that on as an excuse to get by the 2nd amendment. Most people have guns to do violence to individuals, or to threaten violence to individuals. Those people don't have a constitutional right to their guns.
|
Most people that have guns do violence to individuals or to threated violence???
Post a link that backs that up. A small percentage of the people (i.e. criminals) own guns to perpetrate violence -- but they get all the press.
(could that be due to gun ownership laws and the fact that you can buy a gun illegally on almost any street corner)
No those people shouldn't (although they do) have rights to guns... but law abiding citizens do.
You people talk out of both sides of your mouth.... you have to read the context, but militias are now defined as the National Guard or the Army Reserves.
Give me a break!
All the criminals would have to do at that point is call themselves a militia...
__________________
<a href="http://refer.ccbill.com/cgi-bin/clicks.cgi?CA=921196-0000&PA=337888&HTML=http://www.wow18cash.com/">
We may as well just give this fucking $$$ away!</a>