GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post - 9th circuit court of appeals in San Fran rules: No individual right to bear arms.

archer · 12-07-2002, 11:39 AM

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

finally a court has the guts to read the second amendment the way it was meant to be read.

the text is crystal clear, the constitution is speaking of collective rights: of a state's right to defend itself: ie national guards etc. it is not speaking of an individual.

the clause has been twisted from it true meaning.

no single individual has the right to bear arms outside an authorized collective effort.

12-07-2002, 11:39 AM
archer Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Canada Posts: 1,721	"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." finally a court has the guts to read the second amendment the way it was meant to be read. the text is crystal clear, the constitution is speaking of collective rights: of a state's right to defend itself: ie national guards etc. it is not speaking of an individual. the clause has been twisted from it true meaning. no single individual has the right to bear arms outside an authorized collective effort. __________________ Looking to promote uncut cock? Check out Uncut Cash. It rocks.