|
it seems to me that people are just uncomfortable discussing the fact that there are obviously underage viewers on their sites. if you don't want to talk about it, fine, i won't post in this thread anymore, we can let it die. i guess i get the picture of what other people's opinions on the subject are now.
Note that I DID think before posting this, and I thought fairly hard on whether or not it has an effect. To which I myself came to the conclusion that there has got to be a relation between the longevity of a site, it's fanbase, and the taboo 'underage viewers' that apparently everyone is in a fright to mention. i think alot of the return viewers to sites start as underage surfers. Maybe I'm wrong, I don't know...
Of course we all want adult viewers with intention of paying, thats what we all want, nobody WANTS minors eating up their bandwidth with no intention of ever buying. Or to be known as someone who supplies porn to minors, which all of us who are running freecontent sites ARE doing inadvertently (and which I think may be resonsible for outward blasting of the topic on some people's parts, guilt perhaps?). I don't understand why people insist on taking this as though i'm advocating or trying to defend or whatever. I look at people's outward blasting of my thread as their own denial of this fact. Are you afraid to admit to yourself that what you're doing might come with some heavy moral objections? Fact of the matter is that freecontent pornsites are open to anyone horny enough to find them, minors included...
Whatever, I don't really care that much, let the thread die, I don't care to argue it any as I'm not that concerned about it anyways and it really isn't that important. Chop me for attempting to start a reasonable discussion. It went totally wrong I suppose...
|