Quote:
Originally Posted by MMR Blaze
You can defend it if you like. I don't agree with it so I don't want to support it. The girls are under 18 and aren't making their own choices, some misguided adults are. If their models were 18, they wouldn't have to worry about all this.
Do you believe that the guys behind these sites are really interested in furthering the careers of child models? Or is it more likely that as adult webmasters they realized that there was a loophole and they could make money off CP-seeking surfers?
|
honestly I dont know what the webmasters were thinking
nor do I care, my point is this, if it is legal then it is legal no matter what or anyone else fins moraly wrong with it
racial slurs flag burning gay marrige etc etc are all moraly un -acceptible to some person or another just like scat and or bondage
but if its legal
then its legal
there cannot exist an area where the law can go either way depending on the moral standpoint of a prosecutor or investigator
case in point the ray guhn case down here in FL, well the community decided what they were doing was moraly unacceptible and so the charges were filed.....what if I happen to like bondage and IT IS LEGAL
should the local politician use me for a scapegoat whenever he needs a fall guy?? I dont think so
again while I do not support theese guys at all as im sure the ACLU etc dosent either we must support and protect free speech and our personal freedoms
like the news.com article mentioned above magazines like vouge and elle etc etc feature younger girls wearing less........I dont understand the diffrence
and I shut down my slave site for fear of prosecution