Originally Posted by Tempest

CDSmith:

I have yet to see anyone explain to me how saying someone is involved with pedo ventures is the same as refering to them AS a pedo, i.e. that they ARE a pedo. The language is pretty clear unless you read into it what you want to. In one case they're involved with pedo related things which doesn't mean they are one. In the other case they are one. IMO the rules should be tightened up since it leaves ambiguities and "loopholes" for some asswipes to use.

As for this "You've said quite a few things on this board in the past that I have wholeheartedly agreed with, but on this point you're pushing you are way out to lunch in my opinion." he he he.. I remember saying the same thing to you awhile ago about something you were going off about. The nice thing about you is that I know we can have an decent discussion about it and not really take it personally.


baddog:

Yeah nice one.. What you're saying has nothing to do with what I'm talking about or the link you posted that I was supposed to go look at again. Given your previous posts to me, I suspect you re-read something I said and pulled that statement from there.


CDSmith & baddog:

In this post I said the same thing as the two of you.. For making a serious accusation and then not backing it up, he should be banned.
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showpo...3&postcount=46


I didn't see any other posts from him, so no chance to post his proof. You could argue he had enough time etc. etc. etc but there is no stimpulation as to how much time one has and in this case, it really doesn't matter because that WASN'T was he was banned for...

This thread shows what he was banned for:
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showpo...2&postcount=19

So if you want to discuss this with me, stick to the point I'm making. That he did not break the rules that he was banned for. But since you want him gone, you could never agree with me even if you ended up seeing that I'm right.