Originally Posted by Tempest

Only if you assume the term "venture" means sites and that "involvement" means Peaches was "in charge". For all we know it could have been photography for some catalog that featured kids in artistic scenes. Or it could have been a 14 year old non-nude site. Who the hell knows. And since Lee's banned, now we never will and will never be able to judge for ourselves if in fact what Peaches may or may not have been involved with is questionable.

But that doesn't matter.. the rules, as defined, were still not broken.