Quote:
Originally posted by SleazyDream
umm, that's exactly my point - I feel youa re wrong and it was started on the premise of both (paysite and affiliate),
|
umm no.
you have to go one way or the the other.
you argued that there was some overlying premise to the initial post. and of course, there is not. there are several premises. again, i can pull them out of the post if you like.
then, when i mentioned this, you moved on to the title.
if the title was to come into play, then the statment "it was started on the premise of both (paysite and affiliate)" - would be completely bogus. as the title did not mention either.
but now it seems you are back to disregarding the title. if that's the case, and you agree that there is more than a single premise in the initial post - you have no more ground to stand on.
- we agree to disregard the title
- we agree that there is more than one premise in the initial post
if that's agreed, then i am correct. "it was
started on the premise."
the initial premise (ie the premise the post started with) in the first post had to do with paysite owners.
there is no way of getting around it...