Quote:
Originally posted by quiet
---------------------
you did not mention titles until this point. like i said, if you interprete 'this thread was started' - to mean the title as premise, then we have a mis-understanding of terms.
-bringing the arguement down to the level of definitions-
by 'this thread was started' - i mean the words written *in* the thread.
we argued until your final defense was the TITLE. certainly, *including* the title - we are both wrong. but back out of the thread to the title, we could also back out of the title to the website. a slippery slope...
again, i never assumed the title as premise - and it appears you didn't either, until your very last attempt.
|
i mentioned the title cause you kept saying "the thread was started, the thread was started" why not start at the start of the thread then??? - I figgured the title would be relevant as it's contained within the same page the thread is on , it's the first thing about the thread you read on the thread's own URL.
To be honest I don't see how you could back out of the title to the website? the title is contained within the thread - backing out to the website would be allow anything to be correct and would be about as relevant as saying the entire world wide web is relevant to this particular thread.
__________________
This dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog!
Now read without the word dog.
|