Quote:
Originally posted by quiet
the thread was started on that premise. absolutely it was. other premises were added, but that was the starting premise. which is all i stated.
i was simply showing how the paysite owners view was pertinent to the situation. is it not?
49 said it was. several times told me my posts were 'pointless'. they obviously are not.
|
dude, I'm not questioning that your posts were 'pointless' at all - they had a lot of metit and value. Some of the guys questioning you are fools.
I'm not questioning the paysite owner view being pertnant to the situation either.
I am questioning that you say it was started on the paysite premise, that's just your personal situation clouding the fact that it was pointing out both sides, affiliate and paysite.
Many threads have been started on the paysite premise, this is the first one to even suggest with some proper legal background that affiliate income may be GSTable. That being said and since this is the first one I know of to address that point intelligently, the premise may actually been enlightening us to potential tax liability on affilaite income.
Possible??
__________________
This dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog!
Now read without the word dog.
|