Quote:
Originally posted by Kimmykim
Unless someone is being paid on clicks, it DOES NOT MATTER what the click count is. People bitching about shaving clicks are whining pointlessly.
|
The problem is that clicks are shaved to hide signup shaving and keep conversion ratios looking realistic.
Quote:
The bottom line -- the ONLY line -- is what is on the check in the amount space.
|
This attitude is why shaving exists. If webmasters actually cared that they were dealing with crooks, the crooks wouldn't exist. To quote Labret: "We promise we won't fuck you again."
Quote:
And I am not going to start on the subject of cheating thieving resellers that was touched on earlier, other than to say THEY cost honest resellers more money than cheating sponsors ever have.
|
This sounds to me like you are defending shaving, not a position I expected you to take. So, us honest webmasters deserve to be defrauded (shaved is such a friendly term for a felony) - thousands of dollars because of cheating webmasters?
The way I read this is that you are saying fraudulent webmasters are the cause of shaving in sponsors, and that they are costing us money, not the criminals. Perhaps you would care to elaborate on this a bit?
Cheers,
Backov