View Single Post
Old 11-14-2006, 08:06 PM  
wedouglas
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Dearborn, MI
Posts: 5,921
Quote:
Originally Posted by Babaganoosh View Post
Any idea who I work for, moron? I write for one of the larger independent (not owned by a massive publisher like ZD) gaming sites on the internet. I've played the PS3 on a couple of occasions. I am less than impressed.

What REALLY annoys me are the morons who scream "fanboy" when I say things like Halo 2 is the most overrated game in history or that Sony is a huge, smelly, Asian turd.

If you are just itching to buy a new console this week, go pick up a wii. I guarantee you won't be disappointed. Oh yeah, and you'll actually be able to GET a wii.
Which one? BTW, Halo 2 is the most overrated game of all time, but you are simply knocking the system before it is even out.

Now to make you look like a fool.

Quote:
The 360 has xbox live which alone BY FAR outweighs anything the PS3 offers.

If you just HAVE to run out and buy something new, go for the Nintendo Wii. At least there's something revolutionary about the wii. The PS3 is the same garbage Sony has been making for years.
You don't know what the ps3 online community will offer you jack ass. It's not even out.

Also, it very obvious you are a fanboy by how you pass off all Sony's products as garbage. Last I checked, PS2 dominated to market and had even outsold the 360 when they were both out. I guess everyone is lining up to buy these old garbage systems huh? God forbid we even take a look at sales figures of software. Microsofts only winners were Halo and Halo 2. I can't even count on two hands how many games Sony has pumped out over the years the demolish MS numbers. Halo series has sold combined 16 million. The first two GTA's on PS2 moved over 26 million. Sure they have been out longer, but it's not like Halo 2 and GTA1/2 are still selling a ton.

I guess all those people love buying shitty games for their garbage systems.

Quote:
VHS dominated Betamax because of the price vs benefit factor. Betamax offered better video quality but was too expensive for most consumers. Blu-ray is similar. It can hold substantially more data but when games for PS3 are going to cost around $90 a pop, I can't justify the cost. HD-DVD seems like a far more logical choice.
Hmm all the games I saw were for $59.99. OMG, did you know 360 games are also $59.99? This is nuts. PS3 games are way to expensive. The $90 per game arguement is the dumbest arguement ever created in the case of HD-DVD vs. Bluray. I think it's already proven that they aren't going to cost $90. Jackass.
wedouglas is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote