Quote:
Originally Posted by TeenGodFather
I don't have time to put more than say an hour per week into gaming. Multiplayer games suck if you're not a good player, not fun to get killed all the time, or lose every time. you need time to dedicate to the gaming. It's not fun until you're good at it. 
I'll buy PS3 for the 'same' reason I got PS2.
Console + DVD for ps2 (I didn't have a DVD-player)
Console + BlueRay for ps3.
..and I didn't like Xbox, nor Xbox360. The joystick and stuff isn't for me. But PS2 has been entertaining and I've liked it, so I'll stay loyal to the same company. I also have DS and PSP, I use DS more..just because it has 'smaller' games I can play while taking a shit. Like Wario touched. heh.
PSP is a lot better imho though. |
You're buying a PS3 for blu-ray? Heh, that's one of the main reasons I hate Sony. Blu-ray is the Betamax of this decade. I kind of forgave Sony for the Betamax fiasco and bought a PSP with yet another proprietary game format - the UMD. That too has been a colossal flop. I wanted to be able to buy movies in UMD format and watch them while I am on the road. Now since UMD support is quickly dying, I have to rip my DVDs and put them on a memory card so I can watch them on the PSP.
VHS dominated Betamax because of the price vs benefit factor. Betamax offered better video quality but was too expensive for most consumers. Blu-ray is similar. It can hold substantially more data but when games for PS3 are going to cost around $90 a pop, I can't justify the cost. HD-DVD seems like a far more logical choice.
I do have to agree with you on the DS. It's my pooping platform of choice.
