Quote:
Originally Posted by OzMan
That's the part I don't get and for which the "protecting our sites" reasoning isn't valid.
This whole thing would be solved by Zango not allowing bids on urls but since that would drop their income by 95% probably, the chances of them doing that are about the same of them having an installation warning that says "Are you really sure you want this crap on your computer?"
|
Every defense Lar's has thrown out has been bullshit.
- Protecting our sites. (then why target so many other sites)
- Doing this because we have our affiliates bst interest in mind (
this one needs no explanation)
- If we don't do it someone else will (not if you sue Zango and protect your trademarks)
- It's just a pop up (no, its not)
- It is only a small amount of traffic less then 1% ( so then why do it ??? )
The shit goes on and one. When someone makes soo many excuses it tells me they are full of shit and they don't want to stop doing it. Old sales trick, when someone says " no i don't want to buy it, I can't afford it" and you respond, well what if I could give it to you for a price you could afford, and then they say " well I would have to speak to my husband", ok well what if he said he was ok with buying it" well, I don;t like that color, "what if we got the color you did like" , etc.... when you take an excuse away and they keep making new ones over and over, they don't want it (or in the case of AFF, they don't want to stop).