Quote:
Originally Posted by Brujah
Which means the "common practice" argument isn't valid or useful in the first place, so using it in a debate just adds filler and infers that you're using it to justify the practice.
So just stop using it.
|
exaclty, OZ knows that what AFF is doing is wrong.
He can't debate me on the facts, which are in the title of this thread...
- xmatch was targeting xmatch traffic by using zango, making it impossible for there not to be "adware collusions" AKA stealing.
- xmatch has stolen content on their site.
Since he knows this is true and he has no argument his whole defense is to belittle and mock me and try to down play the whole situation " oh this whole thread is not post worthy " LOL On GFY this is not post worthy LOL. " you are ignorant, you don't know how geotargeting works and that there are fake profiles on these site" So what does that have to do about the fact there was stolen content on there regardless and that xmatch was targeting xmatch. " i would defend any sponsor you post about more then the others" LOL suuuurrre you would. " Why don't you post zango causes aids".... You too much OZ.
OZman, the chairman of the equal enforcement of heat against sponsors who get bashed for using Zango too much by Will76. Nice job title you gave yourself there. I look forward to you defending sex search when I give them 3 more post then AFF tomorrow
