View Single Post
Old 11-03-2006, 09:18 PM  
sacX
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,998
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
Everyone questions the reasons for invading Iraq. Most people say "the main reason is WMD, and there was none, thus our reasons were invalid". This is far from the truth. WMD scared us the most, the press played on it, and the Bush clan pushed it on us. Our reason for invading Iraq is simple - it was a human rights issue.

For the same exact reasons we should be in Africa, as well as other areas. And we were in Africa, although we pulled out because it wasn't popular with the public during the Clinton years.

We need to be in Iraq to prevent these things; We need to be in North Korea, Iran, and Africa for the same reasons. Not because we don't like their leaders, but because it's the right thing to do.

How will future generations look at us for not taking action?

Oh, Saddam is guilty as sin. No doubt about it.
There were MANY countries where the immediate human rights situation was worse than Iraq was in 2003, I don't believe for a second that was the REAL reason for invading Iraq.
__________________
Have Asian Language Traffic?
sacX is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote