Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike33
I provided examples of when I think abortion is probably necessary earlier in the thread. I suppose that makes me pro-choice, but I see my reasons as much more limited and strict to most on the pro-choice side.
There are scientists who argue we can feed the entire world. It's not a matter of not having resources, it's the distribution of those resources that's lacking. Society advocates that everybody has certain rights so we're responsible for ensuring those rights are adhered to, which means taking care of those children. It is the other attitude that has also made poverty possible.
No, I don't know. Do you? Are those reasons to end the life? What about those who are not drug addicts and not involved in crime?
I understand that it's life altering, but I still couldn't use that to justify the killing.
Why are you against abortion as a form of birth control?
|
This is going to be like clapping with one hand. Where there is one or a few scientist to advocate one opinion of fact there is always going to be others that can refute it and debate on other given facts.
I don't believe that the other attitude has made poverty possible, there are governments to thank for that as well as other contributing factors, again, it is not black and white.
And yes, I do have statistics for Canada, and believe me, it's not pretty! The point is, is that there is PRO-LIFE and PRO-CHOICE and whatever a persons reason is for having an abortion is their own. Who am I to say that one persons reason is not a good enough reason. Most times women abort with plenty of reason, whether it's good enough for me, is not my business.
And yes, I can see that you couldn't use it to justify it because you will NEVER be in that position.
Because abortion is not a form of birth control, that's why.
And please stop over looking the Foster Care system that everyone keeps mentioning that you neglect to acknowledge!