Quote:
Originally Posted by damian2001
I think the damage has been done by Lar's so called friends... If I was him I would be pissed off that so many people have been quick to jump on the bandwaggon... another victim of GFY Kangeroo court justice.
|
Maybe at some point you will do us all the courtesy of letting us know what is your agenda?
You have been popping up for the last few days, purportedly as a seeker of truth and justice. Yet in every post you have ended up as an apologist for someone who was caught - not for the first time and not in a way at all inconsistent with how he has handled similar issues in the past - wearing a black hat.
You have asked questions and made comments intended to cast doubt, not only on what people have seen, but when it comes right down to it, whether what Lars himself posted here points to any fault. However you have not attempted to suggest an explanation which would have him and the sponsors he represents emerge from this as innocent parties.
And all your posts carry the language of propaganda. For example, I can't speak for anyone else, but I wasn't a friend of Lars before this happened and from my perspective I'm not an enemy now. The terms are irrelevant because they attempt to personalize what is purely a business issue. Come to that, the issue itself is irrelevant in the grand scheme of things, because it is just a symptom of an industry which is slowly but surely growing up.
You can no more prevent that process than my comments are likely to accelerate it. A few years from now Lars and his employers will have done an about face, sold out to someone who does operate professionally, or else their operations will just be a memory. Unless of course you believe that somehow online porn is unique and will not follow the path of every other industry to date.
But in the meantime, I am curious to know why your attempts at balance all seem to come down on a side which would appear to conflict with the interests of anyone who is merely an affiliate.