Quote:
Originally Posted by directfiesta
It is really sad to see how stupid you can be ...
Here is the quote of the article :
So, what a clueless tatooed punk understands is that the death toll rose 2.5 % ... In other words if 205 people died, it would be 200 without the war...
Let me hold your hand and help you comprehend what is written :
" 2.5% of Iraq population "
Any idea of the number of Iraqis ? Here is how they should have tought you in school :
"insert number of Iraqi population " x 2.5 % ....
so:
26,074,906 x 2.5 % = 651 872
Amazing how that comes to the number of the article... And if you feel like debating the number for the Iraqi population, this comes from the CIA site...
So let me add:
 |
You left out: above what would have occurred without conflict
It's a lot of people, we went to war. What part of that don't you get? I didn't say it wasn't 650,000 people, I said we went to war, and lots of people die when that happens. Saddam could have averted it all. I guess your point is the US is evil, and we kill for fun. Wrong. War happens, shit breaks, people die. You think Saddam would have felt all guilty for killing 10 million americans?