Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul-Hodough
I'm have no feelings about this whatsoever. This decision was his, not ours, as per the thread title "Sorry HoDough but I got to GO", and his recent posts regarding his issues with our program's operations. He has the option to continue if he likes, however, I don't see the point in it. It's plainly obvious that he isn't happy with the program for whatever his reasons are, so I bid him a fond farewell.
I agree, the logo isn't necessary, but it is our brand and it isn't exactly "explicit", it's a cartoon of some 1940's characters as shown below:
We are not the only company who does this. Even Playboy issues some of it's checks with "Playboy Enterprises" printed on them:
It's a fact of life, that if you work in porn... you are going to get snears now and again for it. The money is good, the checks are valid. I don't really see the issue here aside from the occasional delay.
Should you promote programs that print their logos on the check? That's up to you. Should the program change it's entire system if you don't like it? I don't think so.
Regards,
Paul |
Hmmmmmmm? Hodough equates itself with Playboy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul-Hodough
his recent posts regarding his issues with our program's operations.
|
Ok, let's break it down. I made three post.
Post 1. about not getting an email reply about a check
Post 2. about the check
Post 3. about the fucking check
So I had to come to the board and make post #1 to even get a reply from Hodough which resulted in being told standard information that most programs put in the FAQ.
After that I didn't feel like sending more email into outter space.
So here we are.
Ahh! Affiliate email, who needs it?
Support forms in the illustrious NATS system, who needs it?