|
This isn't complicated or difficult to figure out at all if you have any fucking sense. Saddam started a war. Saddam lost the war. In order to end the war and remain in power Saddam made agreements. Saddam broke the agreements. If we didn't have a pussy in the whitehouse at the time we would have done what needed to be done at that time. But pussy Bill didn't do that. So now when we have a decent president that is gonna make Saddam live up to his agreements or face the consequences the left calls him a warmonger for doing what should have been done years ago. When i say "what should have been done years ago" i don't necessarily mean war. I mean making him live up to his agreements or face the consequences.
Those that say N. Korea and Iraq being treated differently is hypocritical are full of shit. They are different situations. The agreement with N. Korea was don't build nukes and we will buy you oil. N. Korea didn't live up to their agreement so we stopped buying them oil. The agreement with Iraq was give up your WMDs and prove it to us and we will stop the war. Iraq didn't live up to their agreement so why should we live up to our end of the deal?
Good lord some people are totally blind to reality.
|