Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken
Have you ever thought that running major brand name sites might be different than running a regular porn site?
WebQuest runs these sites according to the clients direction, policies and guidelines. The major brand names can not afford to run the risks that many adult websites take everyday. They have a lot at stake and need to operate in a different manner.
In addition, they each have their own view of how they want their brand represented, what they are and are not willing to do, etc, etc. This sometimes creates an un-level playing field with sites that are willing to show more, do more and in general, push the limits more.
The bottom line is that WebQuest has always produced phenomenal results for each and everyone of its clients, including Hustler, Vivid, GirlsGoneWild, etc. Larry Flynt himself was quoted many times as saying that WebQuest boosted LFP's profits tremendously. Our goal is to satisfy our clients needs, whatever they might be.
There is a reason we have the brand name clients that we do. Every one of our clients have been referred to us by one of our other happy clients, which tells you something. In fact, another big name client was just added to the roster at WebQuest!
http://www.gfy.com/showthread.php?p=...5#post10928275
We had a very long and very prosperous relationship with LFP and an indication of our success is that they are now in a position to take some of the services we provided back in-house. We wish them the best and will continue to work with them in other areas in the future.
|
Just look at their magazines and DVDs, then look at the Internet site.
No way anyone at LFP would of told Webquest to put together a bad site and spend a fortune promoting it. sounds more like Internet people convinced all they need to do is go for Traffic. If you are right then Webquest as professionals should of spoken up. I put together a better site then Hustlers, just did not have the budget to get the $100,000 stands at shows.
As for who was in charge of the site, no one at LFP would admit to having anything to do with it. The editorial staff were ashamed of it.
So if you are right the site will stay much as it is, if I'm right it will change. Time will tell.