Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo
|
The tax folks try to use the Brushaber case to show that taxing income is constitutional, but they fail to mention that this case has to do with foreign related income, which falls with the treasuries definition of, "sources derived".
"....it is hereby held that income accruing to nonresident aliens in the form of interest from the bonds and dividends on the stock of domestic corporations is subject to the income tax imposed by the Act of October 3, 1913."
The U.S. Supreme Court said in 1916 that the 16th Amendment DID NOT change the Constitution because of the fact that Article I, Section 2, Clause 3, and Article I, Section 9, Clause 4, were not repealed or altered; the U.S. Constitution cannot conflict with itself.
and for those who think the 16th amendment made it legal to tax income from your job down at the factory.. Here's your chance to flaunt your knowledge and
win $10,000...
This is one of the more detailed sites concerning income taxes.. Lots and lots of references, laws, codes, rulings, etc. ..