Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Webby
Obviously the Iraqi "resistance" are winning well at the moment - "terrorists" or not. If you want them to up the "anti", I'm sure they will feel OK with this if that is what is on the table. Expect more bombs and body bags arriving home for burial. Is that is what is called "winning the war on terror"? Sounds a really progressive and constructive move  |
The reason why there was no 'resistance'*
under Saddam was because the moment anyone tried to kill him or cause some trouble, he put their family and/ or village through a plastic shredder/ raped them to death/ had them eaten by dogs/ tortured to death/ thrown off of tall buildings/ shot/ blown up. So, there was a great incentive NOT to oppose him.
Since the things which Saddam did to his people are unacceptable and mustn't be repeated, a new reason needs to be given to the jihadis not to fight. So, total war must be waged against the jihadis. No more 'locking them up for being a naughty boy'. Every single jihadi and every single jihad supporter must be killed. And if they happen to know some information which could hasten the winning of the war by the Allies, then they can be tortured until they give that information up. We experiment on animals to save human lives, so we can torture jihadis to save human lives.
*'Resistance'
in the Islamic sense means a bunch of people who want to make an Islamic state in which to oppress absolutely everyone and from which to wage jihad against the unbelievers.