Originally Posted by Scootermuze

I think you just like to try to keep things stirred up..

Explain this in that you seem to have the answers..

One of the buildings is hit on one side only.. with a large portion of the fuel expoding outside of the building, and no fire or intense heat on the other side, yet that side starts crumbing at the same time the damaged side did..

Fires burned for about an hour.. Not enough time to cause enough steel to melt to the extent of collapse.. (If you want to believe kerosene can melt hardened steel)

The buildings were designed to take 2 plane impacts from planes in that size range, yet both buildings failed.

The buildings fell at a speed and in a manner that has never happened other than from controlled demolition.

So you have 2 buildings designed to take multiple impacts, that were hit in different places, and had fires that burned for a very short period, yet they both fall in the exact same manner, at a rate only acheived through controlled demolition..

One building collapsing in that manner is unlikely enough, but two side by side collapsing in such a manner is a bit more than coincidence.

No.. I don't have the answers.. nor do you..

I just have questions, like a growing number of people in this country..

Originally Posted by Franck

Ok, thats it. No more discussing anymore. After these video i think everything is clear to anyone with an IQ above 80.

If people still come up with bombs crap and god knows what i will simply call them retard and nothing more. Thats all they deserve.