View Single Post
Old 09-11-2006, 10:35 PM  
pocketkangaroo
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 8,452
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
you started with a remark that there is no judicial oversite and finished by posting about the fact that there is in fact, judicial oversight?

... and you think i am confused?

The FISA court isn't judicial oversight in my opinion. You need no evidence or suspicion to be given the right to search. You don't need to inform them for up to 30 days in some cases after you've started looking through personal records. And the FISA courts are not required to tell anyone who they allowed surveillance on, even well after the fact.

The FISA courts are not judicial oversight for American citizens. They are there for foreign surveillance. Look no further than the fact the FISA court has denied 2 requests ever. I don't consider that form of checks and balances the "judicial oversight" the constitution asks for.

Last edited by pocketkangaroo; 09-11-2006 at 10:37 PM..
pocketkangaroo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote