Quote:
Originally posted by Trixie
I think we should be more worried about the implications of people like the Enron dudes having kids or even our rich-off-of-foreign-oil-and-in-chargeofthewholefuckingcountrykillingthousandsofch ildrenamonth president and having his little shit children.
The world is what we make of it -- and part of the problem with our world is that we judge "whores" so harshly and legislate against them while we let the good ole boys run amock getting rich by exploiting others in more socially acceptable (read HARMFUL) ways, destroying the environment and the people in it.
That's really sad if Mommy's made a better living for herself and her family by getting her ass reamed out on film than if she'd have been the more respectable TEACHER or something like that . . . but she and her kid(s) will be stigmatized by it. LAME!
Personally I've never worried about my kids (if I ever have any) suffering because of my career as a webwhore. Kids suffer when their parents are stupid assholes and they can be found in every profession.
Did I mention I have an affiliate program? Just call me a spamwhore . . .
WebWhoreBucks
|
You are a retard.
First of all, this thread isn't about if porn people should be <b>allowed</b> to have children. Nor is it about if porn <b>should</b> be stigmatized. It is, and that's a fact, whether you like it or not.
Secondly, if you think worrying about the impact on your kids of you being a "webwhore" (your words, not mine) is nonsense, you probably would make the worst morther ever.