Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Webby
Oh sheesh..
Poor porn merchants can't publish movies with shit dripping all over, "talent" being pissed on, fisting and vomit spewing ... and this evokes a quote from Martin Niemöller??? Poor oppressed porn merchants - their rights are being removed.
The alleged "fetishes" have been illegal under obscenity laws in most countries for years. In almost four decades in the adult biz, I've never known one valid defense for shit (literally) - it's indefensible.
The accused in this case were never part of the adult entertainment business. He may as well have been trading snuff movies, child porn and rape content. It is blatantly obvious that the defendant was aware the material is illegal.
Nuff said - no time for trash, - they cause nothing but problems for the industry as a whole.
|
excellent post also shit like this (no pun intented) gives the right more fire against actually. This kind of stuff can be held up as the reason to get rid of all porn . Also this after this they will come after us, vanilla porn is pretty safe on a federal level because to too hard to shock a jury in the time of nip/tuck.All the cases so far are all extreme because it gives them the gasp factor they need to win.