Originally Posted by wyldblyss

I singled out Nats for a couple of reasons.

1. They have pretty well destroyed a program already by shutting them down. Where they shaving? Who knows, that is for the courts to decide.

2. I have a problem with a company "outing" another company by words alone and not hard and fast evidence. If you are going to out someone. Have the *PROOF* right in the "outing".

3. I think the "outing" NATS did was far too premature. I don't like any company getting a GOD complex. I don't know the entire story (I've heard a little by both sides...but the truth is still yet to come...anyways. .....It made me wonder....did NATS out them to a) Protect the integrity of their program? b) To protect the webmaster community? c) Marketing ploy...hey webmasters...lookie here...we saved your asses (thereby making more sponsors feel pressured to go with NATS)...or d) How the fuck dare you hang up on us...do you know who the fuck we are and who the fuck you are dealing with? Now NATS says profanity was used and they were hung up on. The program said they guy was in his car...and wanted to check numbers before agreeing to pay out a large sum of money (honestly...I would want to double check and make sure NATS was right before they started giving away money)....so what was it? Nats pissed off or concerned? I don't know..don't think anyone really does...but it does concern me.