Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Alky
i think most people leave javascript on, or else most of the links they click on would not work.
|
I think so too.
When I weigh out the advantages over the tiny percentage lost, it's a no brainer.
Here's a link to a sample batch using my JS approach:
http://dinocortez.com/text-gallery-p...e/amateur.html
This used to be over 8 megs of HTML - now it's less than 2.5 megs.
Plus, it looks like the JS includes are being cached so the pages load fast!
This looks like a keeper approach.
Thanks for your comments!