View Single Post
Old 08-28-2006, 02:57 PM  
basschick
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: el lay, ca usa
Posts: 2,540
i would have no problem using NATS.

it's total bullshit the way people claim that their first post about xclusive cash claimed shaving. have we really gotten so stupid that when a person states cold, dry facts that we interpret them so as to suit our own needs for drama? the guy simply stated what happened - which, if correct, isn't actually open to interpretation. he didn't claim the program shaved - he said there was a stats anomaly they were contractually obligated to help him solve.

if you want to say "that means they're shaving", that is YOUR conclusion of the fact there was a reporting issue, not his. if there was a possible reporting issue, that is ALL that that means.

you know, there have been issues like this in our industry where the program WASN'T shaving - so having such an issue does not mean you shave and posting such an issue doesn't mean an accusation of shaving.
__________________
Got Gay and For Women Traffic?
basschick is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote