First, my personal view is that the U.S. government did NOT directly carry out the 911 attacks, BUT many officials were aware that something "big" was likely to happen in NYC ...
And more to the point, the U.S. government went out of its way to take advantage of the situation to further restrict freedoms; there are reports that indicate the Bush administration
prior to 911 was seeking to use (in other words hoping for) some major disaster to push through more laws / restrictions.
Tried travelling lately on a commercial flight ... can't even bring a bottle of water on board ... it's crazy!
To digress a bit, I'm thinking of building a new website all about how "security sucks" ... it will be named, you guessed it, SecuritySucks.com ... still under development, and only an idea at this point, but could be a real winner, since many people want to vent about the flaws / absurdity of "security" in general; probably be a great venue for marketing security products, etc ... anyways, I'm brainstorming out loud.
Getting back to 911 ... if anyone here has a website about 911 tapes (many more were just released the other day), email me ... I have 911Tapes.com that I'm looking to develop or sell...
If interested, please contact me via PM at Domagon (
http://forums.domagon.com ) or email me at
[email protected]
Ron
p.s. some say building #7 was blown up, etc because it fell so fast ... a more realistic possibility is that it was built like crap - keep in mind that in the main twin towers, the designers specified "drywall" instead of concrete for around the elevator shafts and other critical areas. Who knows for sure with all the 911 coverups going on, but often the simpliest explaination is the correct one; building #7 was probably built like crap and thus could take much abuse to its structure.