Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DukeSkywalker
remeber the whole pib cash thing? And the exposing of the mpa2 shave module? What's the first thing everyone was screaming for. A company that would stand behind their no shave policy and have the balls to enforce it. And guess what. A company did come along called too much media and they stood behind their no shave policy. Its funny how soon all you forget how bad you were ALL Fucked by MPA, and how everyone was screaming its time for an honest company to take the stage. Funny how when you get what you all wanted you all moan like little bitches.
Duke
|
I shouldnt have pointed fingers at mpa as a whole. i was short sighted in my reply. As with nats, mpa3 doesnt have a shave feature. I shouldnt have lumped their new product in with their old. for that, i retract the mpa remarks.
However, what i remain steadfast in is the spirt of which my remarks were made. Nats came about because it did not have a shave module. Affiliates wanted affiliate programs who didnt have a shave module. They got one, and when they had a company that stood behind it (which is the reason nats grew so big was because it was built upon a foundation of trust), people are now mad at them for sticking to the very princpal of why so many people use them in the first place!! Do you want a software that protects affiliates? or do you just want things to revert to how they were in the old days. If there is someone living on my block who has an affinity for young children, i want to know who and where he lives. If im sending traffic and im being robbed I want to know by who and how much!
Bottom line...
Duke