View Single Post
Old 08-25-2006, 08:53 AM  
Serge Litehead
Confirmed User
 
Serge Litehead's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Behind the scenes
Posts: 5,190
Mutt, yes XC is responsible for paying affiliates, XC dependable on Nats and Nats is responsible before XC for tracking and accounting(some sort). Nats disables access to admin XC so XC cannot pay even if wanted to do so, am I wrong?.

As I agree with you on checking discrepancies in numbers that everyone should check their numbers, generally discrepancies are unacceptable especially for any sort of financial transactional data/software. you dont think a company providing backbone transactional feeds to walll street wont get sued for false data statements?


at this point no shaving was proved - there is no hard evidence except a suspicious drop of a phone call - this is what was fed to public. i'm almost well sure TTM wouldn't start shit for nothing either. abviously anyone caught in shaving is a done toast in this industry. XC has a right to protect its business with legal action considering it was locked out of their biz and no ability to fullfil even curent payouts not to say able to check for rebill discrepancies. unfortunately affiliates will have to wait untill smoke clears before seeing money - if XC wasn't shaving the damage has been done to it and it's affiliates.

:2cents
__________________
Serge Litehead is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote