Originally Posted by Jace

I hear what you are saying...it could have happened that way and NATS could be at fault in the long run, but what if xclusivecash knew about the "glitch" or whatever it could have been, and did nothing about it for months on end?

wasn't there some other NATS programs owners saying a while ago that occasionally the link between ccbill and nats get disrupted and needs to be "reattached" because of changes at ccbill or changes to the nats software? What if one of those disruptions occured, but xclusivecash never said anything, and continued to knowingly let rebills not get reported back into nats from ccbill?