View Single Post
Old 08-24-2006, 02:37 PM  
RRRED
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: WA
Posts: 6,754
Quote:
Originally Posted by SiMpLe
Absolutely agree with you - When I first read the TMM thread I thought WTF are they thinking, did they actually clear this with their lawyer to let it roll to the masses... After reading the compliant PDF, XC for sure has a solid case.

Check this - XC is a REV-SHARE why would a rev shave in the first place - The goal of a rev-share is to build up as much recurring as possible or your affiliates split on you. No recurring joins = no affiliates simple as that. To me it was a flaw just like all the other times. Noted in the PDF are the programs who have had issues with Nats vs CCbill. TMM took a different path this time for some reason and for this, its going to bite them in the ass.

TMM is brilliant
Psst.. I need to talk to you...
RRRED is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote