View Single Post
Old 08-23-2006, 02:27 PM  
pocketkangaroo
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 8,452
Quote:
Originally Posted by WiredGuy
I can't believe NATS can cripple an affiliate program like this because of a dispute. This disruption affects all webmasters and program owners. Obviously security is an important issue to ensure webmasters aren't getting shaved, but this course of action would never make me want to use a NATS based sponsor.
WG
I know what you are saying but it goes both ways. They are shutting down a sponsor for shaving and thus helping affiliates. It sounds to me like XClusiveCash got caught shaving and instead of facing up to it and saying "it was an accident" and resolving it, they are going the legal route to try and save face.

I doubt if XClusiveCash called them up and said lets resolve this and figure out a solution, we'd be at this point. Sounds to me like a sponsor got caught scamming and wants to go in the corner and cry.
pocketkangaroo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote