Quote:
Originally posted by extreme
Uhm, gecko (mozilla/netscape/etc) should render frames correctly (if you do the frames accordning to the standard). Did you try using this as doctype?
|
they don't.... mozilla seems to render them 1 or 2 pixels off.... Netscape always used to do that too... not sure if it still does... haven't had Netscrape on a system in years. However..... the rest of the framework seems to render in tact.... and I know how I can correct the 1 pixel issue to my satisfaction.... so, I probably will.
Quote:
Originally posted by extreme
heh, 2002? Frames are 199x, CSS positioning is 2002 ;). Check out this link for a simple example. No frames, no tables. Pretty neat stuff this CSS, should work fine with IE 4.0+ and the new netscape/mozilla built on gecko.
|
yeah.. frames do kinda suck... I dig the css positioning! sweet and short code... me likey.... ;-)
I'll hafta try that and see how it works out... the reason I'm using the frames is to postion dead screen center regardless of resolution or monitor size, but hey,... if I can do that with css, I'll dump the frames in a second.
Got some questions though....
1. Why doesn't Mozilla run certain javascript and other javascript it does? Isn't it either on or off? What gives with that?
2. Even if I eliminate the outer frames, I'm still gonna need to use i-framing for a large chunk of stuff.... (that's not really a question I guess.)
thanks for the example link on the css though bro... I'm raping it with my eyes now.... I'll let ya know how it turns out for me.