Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JMM
There is always a compromise that can be reached that protects all parties.
In my PERSONAL opinion, there isn't enough money in the world for me to ruin someones life.
We have an iron clad model release. So iron clad that we are 100% aware that NOTHING is iron clad. There are a lot of greasy slimeballs in this country with law degrees. I have close friends who have experienced models with a lawyer paid for with pussy. I promise you that the model has more pussy than you have cash.
I do applaud your desire to protect your affiliates. They are the lifeblood of our business and affiliates interests are not considered enough in this business. That being said, I stick with my first sentence, there is always a compromise that can be reached that protects all parties.
|
In the case of a solo girl site where the model has been paid for her modelling work and she has signed proper releases and contracts etc, I can't think of what such a "compromise" could be. The site is either up and making money or it isn't.
I'm actually quite glad I didn't go the route of running solo girl sites. I certainly had the models for it 5 years ago, but I know of only a few that would have been reliable enough to do something like this with. And even then it would have been risky.
I've seen way WAY too many posts here from program owners saying such-and-such model has crapped out on them or what-have-you. Some do well with the solo thing, but the concept does have it's headaches. Big ones.
Seriously, signed contract or not, what's to stop this girl's father from freaking out, then hiring a high-punch lawyer to come after the site owners? Really, if they want the site taken down badly enough I'm sure they'd have a pretty good shot at making it happen.