Quote:
|
Originally Posted by vvq
I'm a jackass for believing observable scientific data that points to the big bang theory being the method of creation for this universe?
You do understand that a unified theory (unites the theory of general relativity and quantum mechanics in explaining the creation of the universe) will most likely prove more dimensions and universes. Which in the other thread you were extremely adamant about there being something grander than what we see. Guess what. Proving string theory will also prove exactly what you already believe in.
See the good thing about science, and this may be something you fail to understand, is that it can be wrong. Science can be rewritten. But you're a fool if you think we should all just give up searching for the answer and believe we're in some matrix. The equations, observations, and research done by some of the greatest minds ever point towards the big bang being the method of creation for our universe. If you want me to bust out the scientific data I have no problem doing so. I mean you do believe in the laws of physics right?
|
No, you are a jackass for thinking you will get any intelligent discourse on this subject on GFY. =]
I'm curious to see what Galleryseek proposes is the best theory for the formation of the Universe? Is he thinking "branes" smacking together? A holographic implicit to explicit kind of thing or what? Or maybe he is just saying it's stupid to waste time thinking about it? To that I say it's no more stupid than any single other thing we humans do. What else is there to do but what interests you?