|
I don't get how someone can get accused of wrong doing and when they finally post it sounds to me like, "Ahh, well I don't think we did we anything wrong but rest assured if we did, well then golly gee we sure are sorry about it. We will work hard to correct it, we promise!" And they're first action to correct it is to take the one program that could actually help them to court over a board post? But then why not? They have lots of webmasters hard earned money to spend. I think that's what's called stall tactics. You know when you just can't win the debate so you try to change the subject.
Brilliant I hope it does go to court because I believe NATS knows what it's talking about and I'd be willing to bet when a real judge sees the stats he's gonna urge the DA to investigate charges of fraud. This whole thing would be comical if weren't for all the webmasters who are out thousands of dollars because some program owners were either stealing from their webmasters or too stupid to not question where all the extra money was coming from. In any case, I just gotta shake my head in awe of their audacity.
And, sonofjesus, preach on brotha!
|