Quote:
|
Originally Posted by damian2001
Again just more speculation - If I came to the board and acused someone of cheating everyone would scream for proof or shut the fuck up
|
The sound of axes grinding is almost deafening...
Whatever you choose to read into the original post, it was a carefully phrased statement of fact: discrepancies had been reported to NATS, they attempted to contact the client about the issue, were spoken to in abusive language and hung up on. They suspended the client's license.
By what possible logic are you turning Xclusive into the victim? Their reaction to NATS' call is what changed discrepancies into the perception of possible cheating. If they had behaved professionally and resolved the issue, there would have been no statement for NATS to make, let alone one which lent itself to a very negative interpretation.